Update: I misread the referring article and totally botched the story on this one. What follows is the updated version. The original version is lost to the ages.
I guess this is old news, but it’s new to me… There is no longer a dinosaur called the Brontosaurus. It’s now called the Apatosaurus. Or, more appropriately, the LameNameASaurus.
Here’s what happened:
In the late 1800′s two paleontologists (Marsh and Cope) hated each other, and were in a race to discover more new dinosaurs than their rival.
In his haste to find more dinosaurs than the other guy Marsh discovered a few bones of a 50 foot long dinosaur and called it the Apatosaurus (which translates to “deceptive lizard”).
A little later, he discovered almost a complete skeleton of a 80 foot long dinosaur and called it Brontosaurus (which translates to “thunder lizard”).
Later on, it was discovered that the first dinosaur was really just a baby Brontosaurus, so by the rules of scientific naming, the first (and lamer) name took precedence.
This all came to a head about 20 years ago when the Post Office issued some dinosaur stamps with the name Brontosaurus and was accused by the “scientific community” of promoting scientific illiteracy.
First Pluto, and now the Brontosaurus. The science of my childhood is slowly dying. Pretty soon they’ll be telling me that drinking Lithium is not a cure-all.
He’ll always be Brontosaurus to me.
Incidentally, Brontosaurus is in the spell check dictionary, while Apatosaurus is not.
Source: The UnMuseum

Subscribe / RSS
It was actually one guy (Marsh), not two. Look up “The Bone Wars” between Marsh and Cope. From what I remember, Marsh was a complete ass-hat and tended to rush things — thus the fact that he named the same dinosaur twice.
And there is still debate in paleobiology as to whether the second skeleton he found was indeed a seperate species.
Whoa. Epic fail on my part. -1,000,000 points. (I have to buy myself a hat).
The story makes way less sense if the same guy named both.
I’ll correct the original piece- which will retroactively make these comments not make sense. Oh well.
+321 points for using the phrase “debate in paleobiology.”
I just checked out that link. I am tempted to give them the Honorary Membership donation of $2 to help with the site design.
I’m still in the lead of the arbitrary point game.
Whoa, is this really just a huge game of Whose Line Is It Anyway?
Yes. Without annoying Drew Carey jokes.
Only a matter of time Junior.
Also, it would be awesome if a certain “self-employed” individual created a widget that tracks our randomly assigned points.
Thanks, you just set revenue producing / constructive tasks back by a few days.
Also- Stacy- Isn’t life just a huge game of Whose Line is it Anyway, if you think about it? Trippy.
A dead Speaker of the House is in second place?!?
“Thunderation” deserves to be in second place.
Yep. He got 350 points for saying “Thunderation.“
Come up with a similarly awesome retort and you could get points to.
Or not. It’s arbitrary.